will be a matter of waiting for the count of ten, until next Saturday.
For my brother Lucas, who may never learn of the existence of this journal.
will be a matter of waiting for the count of ten, until next Saturday.
For my brother Lucas, who may never learn of the existence of this journal.
after reading Scripture.
Does it make sense to reverse the order of these events? I refer to chronological order. This dichotomy apparently is not as complicated as the chicken and the egg. It is easy to deduce that can not be read as it has not yet been written.
But does not require the act of writing after reading an intention to gestate?
- Pará, low change - one from the neck screams -. I to you I have good timing you, you're on the field muddy. Do not want to confuse things, the act of reading has nothing to do with imagining reading. They might be strongly correlated but are as different as hunger and digestion (ors usual to distinguish two things? To illustrate this connection why not turn to a specialist in the division, partition and segregation. He then gave the floor to the fragment.
- Well m'ija - expert begins as he settles into his corner - the bottom line for laburo to distinguish is the equipment. Unable to distinguish between two different things if you do not have a sensor element. Without this element has no sense to ask for a method. And that's all. I will not say more about it by now.
Dthings you will be distinguishable to the touch when they have a different, a different weight or mechanical behavior
it deliberately excluded the ear usually does not act as a sensor of bodies but of events.
- And what would be the difference between entities and events? - Skip que jedi you -. Do not give more laps baby, roll over once. However much you want to put things in proper perspective from which everything is a point well known is that the point out there. The rest is ahí.Tiene to be there.
- I kept pretending not to hear me - again -. EF load Let me decgo to me what you think, but with less firulete: "An entity is eternally equal to itself, correct. An event is ever equal to itself, error. When you add the time variable, the certainty of change, unable to assess equality but with oneself. From one point only one point. The rest is possible, yes. But unattainable. "
... branch, until the tree fell. Or perhaps there was never branches? Perhaps only this fall. This ephemeral and sweetly painful fall.